About Eco TerraVault

The experience behind the infrastructure.

Headquartered in Chicago, Eco TerraVault brings together mechanical systems expertise and digital infrastructure operations for private- and public-sector data-center projects across the United States.

OUR MISSION

Help modernize and develop ethical, resilient data centers that support digital progress while respecting water resources, energy affordability, local ecosystems, and the communities they serve.

WHAT WE BRING

Understand the facility.
Understand the operation.

Our founders’ complementary backgrounds shape how we approach a project: from the equipment and environment to the digital services, recovery priorities, and people the facility supports.

01 / MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

The physical foundation.

Mechanical and HVAC knowledge informs cooling, equipment requirements, maintenance planning, and the interfaces between facility systems.

02 / DIGITAL OPERATIONS

The operating perspective.

Enterprise infrastructure and operations experience brings reliability, cybersecurity, recovery, technology dependencies, and the demands of AI workloads into the infrastructure conversation.

03 / COORDINATED DELIVERY

The path to action.

We connect these perspectives through clear scopes, specialist coordination, visible dependencies, and practical readiness and handover planning.

OUR FOUNDERS

Complementary experience.
A shared direction.

Joseph “Joe” Melendez and Roberto Almeida bring the mechanical and technology perspectives behind Eco TerraVault’s work in above-ground facilities and underground development.

CO-FOUNDER

Joseph “Joe” Melendez

Mechanical systems & facility infrastructure

Joe brings more than three decades of experience in the mechanical engineering field, including work with multibillion-dollar companies. His background in mechanical systems and HVAC informs cooling, equipment requirements, maintenance planning, and coordination across facility systems.

A U.S. Army veteran and Purple Heart recipient, Joe brings a practical perspective to Eco TerraVault’s infrastructure work. He connects equipment and systems planning with site requirements, construction coordination, and long-term operating needs.

  • Mechanical systems
  • HVAC & cooling
  • Equipment planning
  • Maintenance planning
  • Facility coordination

CO-FOUNDER

Roberto Almeida

Enterprise infrastructure, data science & operational resilience

Roberto brings more than two decades of experience in technology infrastructure and operations, including managing Infrastructure and Operations (I&O) for major Fortune 500 companies. His expertise spans data centers, IT infrastructure, site reliability engineering (SRE), disaster recovery, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence (AI), data science and analytics, and geographic information systems (GIS).

At Eco TerraVault, he connects enterprise operating requirements with infrastructure assessment, modernization planning, and AI workload readiness. He applies these disciplines to infrastructure intelligence, spatial analysis, and evidence-based decision support, connecting security, reliability, recovery, and community context with the decisions that shape a facility.

  • Data centers
  • I&O management
  • SRE
  • Disaster recovery
  • Cybersecurity
  • AI
  • Data Science & Analytics
  • GIS & spatial analysis
  • Operational resilience

OUR OBJECTIVES

Practical needs today.
Responsible development ahead.

Our service work supports customers’ immediate infrastructure decisions. Alongside it, research advances the modular underground concept through technical evaluation and learning.

01

Strengthen operational resilience

Connect facility systems with service continuity, reliability, maintenance, and disaster-recovery requirements.

02

Make informed lifecycle decisions

Help customers evaluate modernization, cooling upgrades, recovery, reuse, decommissioning, and sunsetting against their operating needs.

03

Develop above-ground and underground infrastructure

Bring site requirements, facility planning, systems coordination, and build readiness into a disciplined development process.

04

Respect resources and communities

Evaluate water supply, energy costs, local ecosystems, equipment life, and community interests together, using project-specific evidence.

05

Advance American ingenuity

Support domestic infrastructure capability and national resilience, with approaches that can serve local needs and compete globally.

OUR LONG-TERM VISION

Infrastructure planned
for its full life.

Ethical data-center infrastructure that serves operators, communities, and the country’s long-term digital needs.

We connect responsible retrofits and new above-ground and underground development with ongoing research into modular facility concepts. Water, energy, ecosystems, and community interests belong alongside reliability and performance in that work.

CHICAGO BASED · NATIONWIDE PERSPECTIVE

Explore the footprint.
Understand the context.

Every infrastructure decision starts somewhere. Explore documented data-center buildings by state, drawn from an open national-lab research dataset.

Explore the wider picture.

Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands are included in our dedicated research workspace, alongside facility records and sourced historical reports.

Open Eco TerraVault Intelligence
1,236mapped data-center buildings
50-state + D.C. study area
RESEARCH SNAPSHOTFebruary 9, 2026

A documented building inventory—not a complete count of U.S. data centers or a live operating-status feed. A campus may contain multiple buildings.

Hover or select a state Chicago headquarters
Mapped data-center buildings by stateAlaska and Hawaii appear as insets. Select a state to see its recorded building count. The Chicago marker identifies Eco TerraVault’s headquarters, not a data-center site.U.S. Census Bureau cartographic boundaries via us-atlas@3 Copyright 2013-2019 Michael Bostock Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.Alabama: 8 mapped buildingsAlaska: No buildings recordedArizona: 42 mapped buildingsArkansas: 2 mapped buildingsCalifornia: 97 mapped buildingsColorado: 17 mapped buildingsConnecticut: 4 mapped buildingsDelaware: No buildings recordedDistrict of Columbia: No buildings recordedFlorida: 11 mapped buildingsGeorgia: 27 mapped buildingsHawaii: No buildings recordedIdaho: 4 mapped buildingsIllinois: 42 mapped buildingsIndiana: 3 mapped buildingsIowa: 58 mapped buildingsKansas: 7 mapped buildingsKentucky: 3 mapped buildingsLouisiana: No buildings recordedMaine: 1 mapped buildingMaryland: 8 mapped buildingsMassachusetts: 3 mapped buildingsMichigan: 8 mapped buildingsMinnesota: 10 mapped buildingsMississippi: 1 mapped buildingMissouri: 12 mapped buildingsMontana: 2 mapped buildingsNebraska: 21 mapped buildingsNevada: 33 mapped buildingsNew Hampshire: 3 mapped buildingsNew Jersey: 46 mapped buildingsNew Mexico: 10 mapped buildingsNew York: 16 mapped buildingsNorth Carolina: 14 mapped buildingsNorth Dakota: 1 mapped buildingOhio: 81 mapped buildingsOklahoma: 4 mapped buildingsOregon: 100 mapped buildingsPennsylvania: 8 mapped buildingsRhode Island: No buildings recordedSouth Carolina: 10 mapped buildingsSouth Dakota: 2 mapped buildingsTennessee: 15 mapped buildingsTexas: 113 mapped buildingsUtah: 13 mapped buildingsVermont: No buildings recordedVirginia: 281 mapped buildingsWashington: 71 mapped buildingsWest Virginia: No buildings recordedWisconsin: 9 mapped buildingsWyoming: 15 mapped buildings
None recorded1–910–4950–99100+

Alaska and Hawaii shown as insets. Colors show recorded building counts, not capacity or environmental performance.

Source: PNNL-led IM3 Open Source Data Center Atlas / OpenStreetMap · Reviewed September 27, 2026

© OpenStreetMap contributors · Open Database License

Discuss a tailored assessment
About the data and its limits

One consistent counting unit.

Counts of distinct building-layer IDs in the published IM3 snapshot, grouped by state. Campus and point layers are excluded; county-boundary duplicate rows are counted once. Includes the 50 states and District of Columbia; excludes territories. This is incomplete mapped coverage, not a census of facilities or an inventory of currently operating data centers. Zero means no buildings recorded in this layer, not no data centers.

This snapshot covers mapped building records. It does not verify current operating status, provide a separate count of planned projects, or include every private, government, or enterprise facility.

Evidence with boundaries.

The map is industry context. It does not represent Eco TerraVault customer sites, operated facilities, certifications, or environmental ratings.

Building counts alone do not measure power demand, water use, computing capacity, or the suitability of a state for development.

View the original research source ↗
Scope and source credits

Data: Open Database License (ODbL) 1.0. Map boundaries: U.S. Census Bureau, via us-atlas.

View all states and D.C.
Recorded building counts · February 9, 2026 source release
State / districtMapped buildingsCoverage note
Alabama8Partial inventory
Alaska0None recorded; not a verified absence
Arizona42Partial inventory
Arkansas2Partial inventory
California97Partial inventory
Colorado17Partial inventory
Connecticut4Partial inventory
Delaware0None recorded; not a verified absence
District of Columbia0None recorded; not a verified absence
Florida11Partial inventory
Georgia27Partial inventory
Hawaii0None recorded; not a verified absence
Idaho4Partial inventory
Illinois42Partial inventory
Indiana3Partial inventory
Iowa58Partial inventory
Kansas7Partial inventory
Kentucky3Partial inventory
Louisiana0None recorded; not a verified absence
Maine1Partial inventory
Maryland8Partial inventory
Massachusetts3Partial inventory
Michigan8Partial inventory
Minnesota10Partial inventory
Mississippi1Partial inventory
Missouri12Partial inventory
Montana2Partial inventory
Nebraska21Partial inventory
Nevada33Partial inventory
New Hampshire3Partial inventory
New Jersey46Partial inventory
New Mexico10Partial inventory
New York16Partial inventory
North Carolina14Partial inventory
North Dakota1Partial inventory
Ohio81Partial inventory
Oklahoma4Partial inventory
Oregon100Partial inventory
Pennsylvania8Partial inventory
Rhode Island0None recorded; not a verified absence
South Carolina10Partial inventory
South Dakota2Partial inventory
Tennessee15Partial inventory
Texas113Partial inventory
Utah13Partial inventory
Vermont0None recorded; not a verified absence
Virginia281Partial inventory
Washington71Partial inventory
West Virginia0None recorded; not a verified absence
Wisconsin9Partial inventory
Wyoming15Partial inventory

National reach. Site-specific judgment. From Chicago, we help private- and public-sector teams evaluate infrastructure, resources, and operational needs across the United States.

Explore our assessment approach

START A CONVERSATION

Bring your infrastructure priorities to the conversation.

Share your infrastructure priorities or interest in collaborating.

Tell us about your project