Data-center records
1,748 imported source records + 4 independently researched ETV supplement records.
Imported source snapshot: Sep 26, 2026. Lifecycle stages vary.ECO TERRAVAULT INTELLIGENCE · NATIONAL CONTEXT
Explore source-reported facility records alongside reviewed evidence and dated national research. Clear definitions turn market information into a stronger foundation for infrastructure decisions.
Compare source coverageCOVERAGE & FRESHNESS
These indicators describe Eco TerraVault’s displayed inventory. They measure source coverage and documented classification—not the size or performance of the entire U.S. market.
1,748 imported source records + 4 independently researched ETV supplement records.
Imported source snapshot: Sep 26, 2026. Lifecycle stages vary.4 above ground · 8 underground · 0 mixed.
1,740 remain unclassified. Missing evidence never implies above-ground construction.The workspace includes 50 states, Washington, D.C., and five inhabited U.S. territories.
A jurisdiction without records represents a coverage gap, not zero existing data centers.Catalog review: . Physical-setting review: . Catalog inclusion does not mean every source claim has been independently verified by Eco TerraVault.
Catalog records and mapped buildings use separate units and source snapshots. Do not add these columns together.
| Jurisdiction | Catalog records | Mapped buildings |
|---|---|---|
| American Samoa | No records | No records |
| Guam | 4 | No records |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 2 | No records |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 1 |
| U.S. Virgin Islands | 1 | No records |
Building layer: 1,237 mapped building records, source dated Feb 9, 2026. No records means unknown coverage in that layer.
DATED PUBLISHER OBSERVATIONS
Published totals differ because inventories follow different inclusion rules. Compare each figure with its unit, lifecycle, geography and date. The sources reviewed do not provide one complete, current public federal inventory of every U.S. data-center facility.
These figures overlap and are not additive. Their spread is not a statistical confidence interval. A larger directory does not establish more verified operating facilities; source details explain the difference.
The full source comparison is available below. Enable JavaScript to search and filter this view.
8 of 8 source observations
2,108 operational · 846 under construction · 4,210 announced; other stages retained in the total.
Comparison boundaryThe publisher’s 7,164 active-pipeline figure includes operating facilities.
Announced projects are not committed deliveries. The full inventory also retains delayed, land-banked, not-approved and canceled projects.
Aterio — Data Centers in the United States (opens in a new tab)Publisher-reported figure checked against the source page. Individual records have not all been independently verified by Eco TerraVault.
Market coverage spans operational and development stages; the headline is not an operating-only subtotal.
Comparison boundaryFacilities follow the publisher’s market and listing definitions.
This is the figure observed on the review date. Territory inclusion and individual site status require record-level reconciliation.
Baxtel — United States Data Center Market (opens in a new tab)Publisher-reported figure checked against the source page. Individual records have not all been independently verified by Eco TerraVault.
1,302 operating · 2,196 planned, as displayed in the publisher’s summary cards.
Comparison boundaryThose two status cards leave 45 records unreconciled against the displayed total.
Includes crypto-mining projects and separate expansions. The reported status subtotals are not a complete partition; no missing status is inferred.
Cleanview — U.S. Data Center Project List & Tracker (opens in a new tab)Publisher-reported figure checked against the source page. Individual records have not all been independently verified by Eco TerraVault.
Commercial directory headline; operating status is not established for every listing by this figure.
Comparison boundaryTerritory figures cannot simply be added to a market total that already includes territory entries.
Useful connectivity and colocation market context. This reviewed headline does not establish a deduplicated national operating-facility count.
Cloudscene — United States Market Overview (opens in a new tab)Publisher-reported figure checked against the source page. Individual records have not all been independently verified by Eco TerraVault.
The inventory spans operational, construction, permitted, proposed and canceled records.
Comparison boundaryThe 2,242 all-type headline also includes 197 crypto-mining and 297 generation records.
This is a publisher snapshot observation, separate from the exact source version used in Eco TerraVault’s map. All-type capacity and status totals cannot be treated as data-center-only measures.
Compute Atlas — Dataset Coverage and Completeness (opens in a new tab)Publisher-reported figure checked against the source page. Individual records have not all been independently verified by Eco TerraVault.
Commercial listings include operating facilities and development projects.
Comparison boundaryA facility listing, a campus and a map location can represent different units.
The publisher’s broader listing metric uses a different counting rule. Its geography, status and parent-campus relationships must be retained when comparing records.
Data Center Map — USA Data Centers (opens in a new tab)Publisher-reported figure checked against the source page. Individual records have not all been independently verified by Eco TerraVault.
Operating, construction, planned, paused and historical / inactive records.
Comparison boundaryThe separate 5,022 map-location count includes additional markers; it is a different unit.
The two figures are not the endpoints of an uncertainty range. Published or announced MW is distinct from measured electricity use.
dcmap.us — U.S. Data Center Map (opens in a new tab)Publisher-reported figure checked against the source page. Individual records have not all been independently verified by Eco TerraVault.
Also reports more than 1,500 in development: construction, planned and land-banked.
Comparison boundaryThis historical analysis uses Data Center Map; it is not an independent second facility inventory.
Canceled and uncertain projects were excluded from its planned group. Retain the February source snapshot when discussing rural development, even though the article was published in April.
Pew — Most New Data Centers in the U.S. Are Coming to Rural Areas (opens in a new tab)Publisher-reported figure checked against the source page. Individual records have not all been independently verified by Eco TerraVault.
The comparison references public publisher observations. It does not combine or republish their underlying commercial databases. Detailed entity reconciliation and source-qualified analysis are available through a scoped Eco TerraVault engagement.
NATIONAL ENERGY & FEDERAL RESEARCH
A national equipment model can inform demand scenarios. A survey pilot tests measurement. Neither identifies the physical setting, operating condition or resource use of every individual map record.
BERKELEY LAB · 2025 REPORT UPDATE
Published June 18, 2026 · National modeled estimates
The bottom-up equipment model estimates national electricity demand. These quantities are kept separate from facility disclosures and are never distributed to map locations using their share of record counts.
DOE / Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory report (opens in a new tab)EIA · MEASUREMENT DEVELOPMENT
2026 voluntary pilot studiesEIA’s studies use surveys in Texas and Washington and interviews in Northern Virginia / D.C. to test data-center energy reporting.
They do not provide a completed national facility census. A planned completion date is not evidence of published national results.
No completed national results were located in the EIA materials reviewed on September 27, 2026. Survey development is tracked separately from published statistical findings.
EIA pilot-study announcement (opens in a new tab)The USGS study’s 771 mapped locations cover 11 western states plus Alaska. This regional siting research cannot establish a nationwide facility or underground total.
Published July 22, 2026. The study examines infrastructure in relation to Bureau of Land Management lands.
USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2026-5035 (opens in a new tab)A permit documents a regulatory milestone and equipment scope. Generator capacity, IT capacity, electricity use, water consumption and emissions each require their own measurement boundary.
Explore permitting & public recordsFROM PUBLIC CONTEXT TO A DEFINED ENGAGEMENT
Resolve facility identities, development stages, resource evidence and location-specific considerations. Eco TerraVault brings data science, GIS and infrastructure experience to a documented analysis of your investment, retrofit or development decision.
Discuss your assessment